Time to review strategy?

The top six remain the same but the order has changed HKU's 'Smurf Village' remains 1st, GCal's 'Saltire' are up to 2nd from 4th, 'HKPolyU's 'Tempe Construction' down to 3rd from 2nd Curtin's 'The Mighty Ducks' are up to 4th from 5th and Newcastle's 'UoN Nobby's are up to 5th from 6th, Chongquing's 'Chongquing University CIOB Student Center' are down to 6th from 3rd. Challenging the top six are teams from London Southbank, HKU, RMIT and Curtin and the points difference is not great.

Universities with teams in last year's final but not in the top six, yet, are RMIT, last year's winners, Loughborough and Greenwich. There are considerable movements below the top ten so there is still plenty of time.

It's time to review strategy.
Teams set out with a strategy, a set of objectives, a game plan how to achieve their targets. After three rounds it is a good time to review how well the original strategy is working. Evidence of good leadership is to have the strength to review your strategy and make changes if necessary. Clinging on to a strategy that isn't quite delivering results isn't good management. Real directors have their strategies continually challenged by the dynamic nature of the market, competition for work and staff, uncertainty and risks. This calls for flexibility in response.

Period 7 results

Preliminary results, subject to change.
(Teams with a negative 100% have requested late submission or have been asked to resubmit)

Top 10

Team's improvement